Header 1

Our future, our universe, and other weighty topics


Showing posts with label alien abductions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label alien abductions. Show all posts

Thursday, October 5, 2023

Quite a Few So-Called "Alien Abductions" May Be Spiritual Experiences

Netflix has an interesting new series called "Encounters" dealing with UFO sightings and similar reports of the paranormal. One episode partially deals with a reported UFO sighting at the Ariel school in Ruwa, Zimbawe.  On September 16, 1994 about 60 school children between nine and twelve claimed to have seen a strange craft and strange beings near the craft.  The same episode deals with Harvard professor John Mack, who interviewed some of the Ariel school children.  In the 1990's John Mack started seriously studying reports of paranormal experience that are often called "alien abduction" accounts (although, as I will explain, such a term may be an inappropriate one for many of these cases).  His scientist colleagues expected him to produce a paper or book suggesting that accounts of alien abductions are produced by people with mental illness. Instead, Mack produced the 1996 book "Abduction: Human Encounters With Aliens," in which he stated that the people telling such stories seem to be generally of sound mind.  Mack suggested that the people may well have been reporting experiences of something that really happened, not just something that was all in their minds.

The behavior of Mack's fellow scientists was one of the most shameful episodes in the recent history of science.  Mack was subjected to merciless gaslighting from fellow scientists, who treated him as if he had lost his mind or gone over to some "lunatic fringe."  Mack's serious scholarship on observational reports well-worthy of study was treated as an abhorrent aberration by materialist professors eager to "sweep under the rug" such reports and prevent people from studying them. It was just more of what has gone on for more than 200 years within scientific academia: scientists senselessly ignoring important-seeming observational reports they should have been paying attention to, for the sake of maintaining a storyline consistent with their materialist dogmas and poorly grounded boasts of understanding human minds or human origins.  Harvard put together some "Star Chamber" style secret committee to try and revoke Mack's credentials. In 1995 it was announced that after a year of "closed door hearings" Harvard would not discipline Mack. The article pointed out that the hearings had cost Mack more than $100,000 in legal expenses. Mack eventually died suddenly after being hit by a car.  

A key question is: how much of Mack's accounts were obtained through hypnosis?  On page 32 of his book "Passport to the Cosmos: Human Transformation and Alien Encounters" Mack states this:

"A modified hypnosis or relaxation exercise may be used to help focus the client's attention upon their inner experience and memories, but it should be emphasized that about 80 percent of the information is obtained through conscious recollection...We are careful not to lead individuals or to encourage them to 'produce' and abduction story --we use neutral, encouraging comments and questions."

This raises a question mark about the reliability of the accounts, because it is known that under hypnosis people can be extremely suggestible. A nineteenth century work describes this aspect of hypnotism, describing some hypnotized subjects:

"When they drank water, and were told that it was milk, coffee, rum, whisky, or wormwood, they tasted it as such. Nay, after drinking it as whisky, they were told that they were drunk, and in a minute or two became, in every particular, very drunk indeed. The expression of the face was perfectly that of intoxication, and they could not walk a step without staggering or falling. They were easily made, by suggestion, to fancy themselves any other persons, and acted in character. They shot, fished, swam, lectured, and exhibited every feeling suggested to them. They were as easily made to suppose a stick to be a gun, a rod, a sword, nay, a serpent ; or a chair to be a tiger or a bear. From these animals they fled with extreme terror. They were made to see, hear, and feel a dreadful storm, and to creep for shelter under a table or a chair, supposed by them to be a house."

It is quite a potential problem for us to be told that 80% of reported recollections come from "conscious recollection" and that hypnosis was used to get some of the accounts.  That makes it unclear whether a particular detail we hear from someone did or did not come from statements under hypnosis.  A good technique would be:

(1) Whenever citing or quoting anything that a particular person said under hypnosis, always tell the reader that such a statement was made under hypnosis.
(2) If a person ever makes some sensational claim under hypnosis, attempt to verify such a claim by seeing whether it is made by the same person under more than one hypnotic session. 

Unfortunately, it seems that Mack failed to follow such a technique.  But we should not necessarily throw away the accounts he has gathered, merely because of such imperfect methods.  

Another complaint I have about Mack is his terminology.  His book titles seem to overuse the term "abduction" and to presumptively use the term "aliens."  A typical account in Mack's books will involve some encounter with some mysterious entity of unknown origin.  Why should we be using the term "alien" to refer to such entities? In most cases no claim is being made by anyone to have learned that the strange entity encountered is from another planet.  If such reports come from encounters with real mysterious entities, we do not know whether such entities are spiritual, extraterrestrial or extra-dimensional.  Often the reports involve mystical-sounding or spiritual-sounding experiences that it may be inappropriate to describe as "abductions," a term with a strong criminal connotation.  Mack's 1996 book should have had a less presumptive title, something such as "Human Encounters With Mysterious Entities."  And Mack's use in his books of the term "alien abduction phenomenon" is unfortunate.  It would have been better to have used a more general term such as "involuntary high-intensity anomalous experience." 

The fact is that humans have for a very long time reported an extremely wide variety of encounters with mysterious entities:

(1) For ages humans in normal health have reported that in normal waking consciousness they suddenly and unexpectedly encountered apparitions of the dead, appearing as full or partial human figures.
(2) Very large numbers of dying people report seeing apparitions of the dead, a phenomenon sometimes called deathbed visions.
(3) Many have reported seeing mysterious humanoid figures such as  Bigfoot or Yeti.
(4) In near-death experiences people report seeing a wide variety of mysterious entities that may include some numinous "Being of light," deceased relatives or deceased friends, angelic or semi-angelic figures, or various other mysterious figures. 
(5) A thorough examination of the history of spiritualism will reveal very many reports of encounters with mysterious figures appearing during seances, figures often called materializations.  A prominent example is the Katie King apparition or materialization well-studied by the scientist Sir William Crookes.  Read the section entitled "Miss Cook's Mediumship" in the newspaper account here for a very detailed account, and my posts   here, here, here and here for related information. 
(6) The lore of the Catholic Church includes numerous stories of encounters with mysterious figures, often identified as the Virgin Mary or saints.  An examination of the lore of Mahayana Buddhism would probably produce very many similar accounts. 
(7) Users of certain types of drugs report seeing mysterious entities, and sometimes claim to see the same type of mysterious entities (with a very distinctive non-human appearance) whenever they take a particular type of drug. 
(8) In quite a few cultures there are figures called shamans who claim to be able to go on spiritual journeys in which they may encounter mysterious entities.
(9) As discussed here, a small group of people claim to be able to practice at will something called astral projection in which they have out-of-body experiences that may involve claimed encounters with strange nonearthly intelligences. 
(10) We can find in every major religion some mystics who claimed to  have trips of the soul in which they encountered some superhuman reality. 

People don't learn about such things (except in the briefest and the most superficial way) when studying to become psychology professors. Mack should have thoroughly studied such reports as part of his investigation into the accounts he has labeled as "alien abduction" reports.  But I don't see very much evidence of such scholarship in Mack's writing.  If Mack's scholarship had been deeper, he might have tended to use some more general term to describe the reports he had studied, rather than to put them all into some "alien abduction" category. But Mack was very diligent about personally interviewing people reporting anomalous experience, showing none of the "fear of hearing firsthand testimonies" we so often get from skeptics. 

On pages 72-73 we hear of a person named Jean who reported very frequent reports of being taken to what she called a spaceship. She said that "sometimes it was like being 
beamed up" and "sometimes it was like being sucked up, sort of like a vacuum cleaner, and all of a sudden just whoosh!" The beings she claims to have encountered (in what she calls a spaceship) are described by her as "very refined presences" and "literally beings of light." On the next page we read her
claims that she was given "a new cosmological system"
that enabled her to "plug into Source, or God," having 
"a capacity to heal myself and heal other people" and
become "a medium to, if you will, the Divine." The report sounds like a very spiritual affair, and we may wonder why mystical-seeming encounters such as this are put in the category of close encounters with extraterrestrials, as if some purely physical encounter with a nuts-and-bolts spaceship had occurred.  


On page 74 we read of an Andrea who describes an encounter beginning with a beautiful flash of light. She reports that she floated feet-first through the glass of her window, rather as if it was her "astral body" moving rather than her physical body. She recalled thinking "I'm not a body anymore," and thought "I'm light." She reports encountering strange creatures that "look like they're made of light."  On page 75 a Karin reports a feeling that was like moving at ultra-fast speeds "basically tucked in a ball." We read, "For Karin, these overwhelming energies seem to have a kind of 'universal power' as if they emanate from God." The next two accounts we get (from two other people) also sound like mystical or spiritual experiences, with lots of mention of encounters with mysterious intense energies, but little mention of anything sounding like protoplasmic extraterrestrials in metal spaceships. 

Here is an encounter described on page 161 of one of Mack's books. Dave reported beings who he could see only as silhouettes taking his "inner self" or "inner spirt" out of his body and taking him through large transparent tubes, "into the next plane." In the next plane there were beings that appeared luminous, like "giants" with "crystal" bodies. They had big heads with large eyes having beautiful colors. We are told, "The beings would not permit Dave to go further into the light, which seemed to be coming from a great 'inner city' of some sort, because, they told him, he was going back to the Earth plane. Dave said he was brought to this plane to show him that there was "life beyond this life," and that there are other planes of reality into which we will eventually pass. We read this:

"Dave and the other two people felt a warmth in this other plane, a sense of belonging there, and he did not want to come back to Earth. He described a place of overwhelming joy, without pain, filth, anger or discontent, an awesome realm where nothing and no one was above another and
existence itself was like light. The realization that this was 
only a demonstration, and that he could not actually fully 
experience the light, filled Dave with a sense of loss. 
But he has a strong sense that after death in prior lives, it 
is into this other plane that he has passed and that he will return to it again when this life is over." 

Any student of near-death experiences will recognize several elements in this account. They include (1) an idea of an inner self kind of traveling out of the physical body; (2) a trip through a tunnel; (3) encountering strange luminous beings;  (4) a report of a kind of unearthly "city of light"; (5) being told that you must return to Earth; (6) a feeling of regret about having to go back to Earth; (7) an idea of "life beyond life" or some "higher plane" which a human will eventually reach.  We may wonder: why has this very spiritual-sounding account been put in a book with a title insinuating an encounter with flesh-and-blood extraterrestrials?

We may notice here a huge contrast between the report above and the stereotypical idea of an alien abduction. Asked to describe a typical account of an alien abduction, the average person (based on press accounts) might report someone being forced into a flying saucer, tied down, and subjected to terrifying medical examinations.  The account above is pretty much the exact opposite of such a terrifying encounter with a "nuts and bolts" spaceship.  The report is of a very positive experience. And instead of being an experience with a physical spaceship on Earth, the person is taken to what seems unearthly spiritual realm. 

On pages 163-164 we have some interesting suggestions that some of the imagery that shows up in some of the so-called "alien encounter" or "alien abduction" accounts may be symbolic imagery.  So a person who reports seeing some reptile-like alien may be seeing some manifestation that symbolizes some lower intelligence or lower spiritual level, rather than a literal species that arose on some other planet with a reptile-like form.  

It is widely believed that visual symbolism occurs in dreams.  Dream content is worthy of serious study, and some dreams may come to humans telepathically from some external reality beyond our understanding.  One of the reasons I suspect such a thing is that for years I have been logging my own dreams, and I do not at all find them consisting of mere random content. During the past three years my dreams have seemed to heavily repeat themes involving life after death.  I have had had more than 400 dreams in the past three years that seemed to symbolize the theme of life after death, as I report in my very long post here. Very often such themes seem to be expressed with symbolic imagery. 

Some of the experiences called "alien encounters" or "alien abductions" may be mental communications from some mysterious external reality, similar to dreams, but appearing more vivid than dreams.  On page 164 Mack makes an interesting speculation:

"The beings and their UFO-related 'props' may seem almost...to disguise themselves, as in Carol's encounter, through inhabiting the familiar images of the experiencer's knowledge base...One might also consider that it may be a means that the beings, or the intelligence behind them, utilize to mute the traumatic impact of the intense energies and the shock of unfamiliar images, while at the same time opening the experiencers to the mysteries of the unknown by breaking down the boundaries of their familiar world...Animal images that abductees encounter  may, as they do for some
native people, serve to disguise humanoid beings, but they may also represent archetypal symbols of great power and meaning that can propel them on their transformative journeys." 

I often get the feeling after analyzing my dreams that some recurring element is a symbolic token representing something deeper. For example, my very frequent dreams of being on a bus, train, boat or aircraft may symbolize traveling to some unearthly realm. My very frequent dreams of being on an elevator or escalator may symbolize going to some higher realm of existence.  My very frequent dreams about crossing some border or barrier and going to some other side of something may symbolize some an eventual trip to some Other Side of an afterlife. Let us imagine some higher intelligence (possibly spiritual in nature) wanting to convey to someone an idea of some encounter with some higher reality of great power and knowledge.  Such a message might be conveyed through modern icons and symbols such as UFO encounters,  entering into a spaceship, encountering a humanoid creature with a huge head and giant eyes, and so forth.  Perhaps just as we should often ask "what does it symbolize?" when analyzing dreams, we should ask "what does it symbolize?" when analyzing some reports sounding like encounters with extraterrestrials. 

Continuing to use the word "alien abductions" to refer to a variety of experiences that may or may not provide evidence of visiting extraterrestrials, on page 237 Mack says, "In this chapter I will try to show how the alien abduction phenomenon can potentially be one of the most powerful agents of spiritual growth, personal transformation, and expanded awareness that is now affecting people on this planet." A bit later (after quoting someone referring to "Divine Source") Mack states, "Sometimes abductees perceive, or are told by the beings, that their (the 'beings') true nature is a kind of energy form, but that they have to become embodied to play this intermediary role between humans and Source. " On the next page we read, "Abductees sometimes express the conviction that the Earth is not their true Home, which is in another realm outside of time and space." Such an idea is frequently expressed in accounts of near-death experiences. 

On page 244 one of the persons described as an "alien abductee" describes a scenario under which humans choose to become incarnated as humans here on Earth, possibly for reasons such as spiritual or moral growth.  Two pages later another "abductee" expresses a similar idea. The underlying idea is one that has often been suggested by dreams and near-death experiences, as I discuss in my post here.  On page 251 we have one of the "abductees" describing a "choice of whether to come back to your earthly body" choice that sounds like a very common motif of near-death experiences.  When describing such things, Mack fails to point out resemblances between such experiences and other types of spiritual experiences (such as near-death experiences) that are never called "alien abduction" episodes.  We get the impression that Mack was very diligent in studying the people he interviewed, but was not much of a scholar of the more general topic of paranormal or spiritual experiences.   Doing a little better about drawing connections, on page 256 he states this:

"The abduction experiences affect profoundly the experiencers' sense of who or what they are as beings in the cosmos. Their transformation, which they attribute directly to their encounters with the infinite or the creative Source, is often expressed in the ecstatic language generally associated with mysticism or other experiences of transcendence."

On the next page we are told that "when they no longer deny their experiences and confront them honestly, abductees tend to lose their fear of death."  We hear of one "abductee" claiming to have made contact with her deceased son. 

The more we hear about these people describing their experiences as factors producing spiritual growth and worldview deepening, the more we should tend to think poorly of those who tried to gaslight Mack and his subjects, and who tried to suggest that Mack was guilty of malpractice by not labeling his subjects as psychotics, and not prescribing them anti-psychotic medication.  

A very interesting possibility is that some of the strange events described while someone is under hypnosis (and sometimes categorized as "alien abduction experiences") may be neither fantasy nor recollections of encounters with extraterrestrials, but instead what may be examples of what used to be called "traveling clairvoyance." During the first half of the nineteenth century, when hypnosis was called "Mesmerism," "animal magnetism" or "somnambulism,"  there would often seem to occur astonishing displays of clairvoyance by people under hypnosis.  The hypnotist would invite the hypnotized person to kind of "go with him" on a mental trip to some place the hypnotist knew well, but the hypnotized person had no knowledge of.  The hypnotized person would often describe the place with astonishing accuracy, and might describe details about the actions of its current occupants that were quite unknown to the hypnotist, but which would subsequently be verified as being correct.  It was rather as if some power of the mind to travel outside of the body and explore the external world was being unlocked.  

When some hypnotized person asked about an alien abduction describes seeing some beings of light and visiting some unearthly realm, he may use the present tense. The hypnotist will tend to interpret this as some recollection of some weird encounter that previously happened.  But what is occurring may be no recollection of a past experience, but instead an example of traveling clairvoyance or something like astral projection in which the hypnotized person is temporarily unshackled from his bodily limits, and is able to make contact with realities beyond our planet, realities that may be spiritual or involving some other dimension.  Such an idea is unthinkable only to those who deny the existence of the human soul.  During near-death experiences there seems to be a travel of a human soul beyond the body. So why should we should exclude the possibility for such a thing to a happen under hypnosis, particularly since there is so much nineteenth century evidence that under hypnosis certain subjects could display all kind of wonders such as immunity to physical pain and traveling clairvoyance? 

There are quite a few attempts to shoe-horn so-called "alien abduction" accounts into a "nuts and bolts" kind of explanation of visiting metal spaceships from other planets. Such attempts often involve ignoring what was reported.  For example, in a book on alien abduction studies  an author says, "When abductees described communication with occupants, it was almost always accomplished telepathically; they said they received  'impressions' that their minds converted to words."  That already takes you out of the world of materialism and its "brains make minds" claims, into the world of psychic phenomena. Again we have a parallel with near-death experiences, in which people abundantly tell us that some idea was received telepathically, rather than by hearing some spoken words. 

Wednesday, August 11, 2021

Alternate Explanations (Some Paranormal) for "Past Life Recollections"

What is called past life regression is a technique wherein a therapist puts someone in a hypnotic trance or a state of deep relaxation, and then asks the person to tell about a past life that occurred before the person's current life. Very many people will give accounts suggesting a previous life. Skeptics say this is not really evidence for reincarnation, but just an example of suggestibility. It is well known that people can be extremely suggestible under hypnosis. 

But there may be some reasons for thinking that more than just imagination may be involved in such "past life accounts." Psychologist Helen Wambach used hypnotic regression techniques on more than 1000 people, and collected data sheets on the statements made.  A series of common questions were asked, mostly relating to details about that could be checked, such as the type of home and the type of eating utensils used.  Wambach said that when the data sheets were checked against historical realities, very few discrepancies were found.  She said she found that only 11 out of 1088 accounts had "clear evidence" of historical or factual discrepancies (such as someone claiming he had played a piano at a time before the piano was invented). 

Reading Wambach's book Reliving Past Lives: The Evidence Under Hypnosis, I have some concerns about her technique. Her technique was apparently to ask leading questions such as "It is now the year 1700, what do you see?"  That kind of question will create an expectation that the hypnotized subject is supposed to provide some story of a past life. A better technique would be to ask neutral questions that do not suggest some belief in reincarnation. An example might be to first ask: "What year were you born?" and then to ask "Do you recall anything that happened to you before that year?"  On page 96 she tells us that she told people before being hypnotized that "their subconscious would have control over their experience of the past life recall," thereby creating the idea that some past life recall was expected from the hypnotized people. 

We know that under hypnosis people are extremely suggestible. A nineteenth century work describes this aspect of hypnotism, describing some hypnotized subjects:

"When they drank water, and were told that it was milk, coffee, rum, whisky, or wormwood, they tasted it as such. Nay, after drinking it as whisky, they were told that they were drunk, and in a minute or two became, in every particular, very drunk indeed. The expression of the face was perfectly that of intoxication, and they could not walk a step without staggering or falling. They were easily made, by suggestion, to fancy themselves any other persons, and acted in character. They shot, fished, swam, lectured, and exhibited every feeling suggested to them. They were as easily made to suppose a stick to be a gun, a rod, a sword, nay, a serpent ; or a chair to be a tiger or a bear. From these animals they fled with extreme terror. They were made to see, hear, and feel a dreadful storm, and to creep for shelter under a table or a chair, supposed by them to be a house."

hypnotic suggestion

Since people are so very suggestible under hypnosis, it could be that people telling stories of past lives are merely responding to the suggestion of their hypnotist, in a way similar to the cases listed above. 

Another type of possible evidence for reincarnation consists of young children who start to say they have memories of a previous life. Typically the child will claim to remember details of the life of a person who died not long before the child was born. There have been many cases in which information on the  claimed "previous life" was obtained, and a close match was found between the child's statements and the details of the corresponding person's life and death.  Researcher who have published investigations of many such cases include Ian Stevenson and Jim Tucker. 

On a web page discussing the research of Jim Tucker, we have the following interesting set of numbers:

Median age at the time of the previous person's death: 28.
Percent of the children claiming they died a violent or unnatural death: 70%.
Percent of the children saying they had the same gender in a previous life: 90%.
Median time between the claimed death and the child's birth: 16 months. 

The previous figure differs from a figure cited by Wambach, who gives a figure of about 50 years between past lives. 

Does the evidence above show the likelihood that reincarnation occurs? Perhaps not, partially because there are alternate explanations why such things might happen even if no one is being reincarnated.  If you are a materialist, you are very limited in the alternate explanations you can give. But there is no reason why we have to limit ourselves to material explanations. We can imagine paranormal explanations or spiritual explanations other than actual reincarnation. 

One explanation is that souls survive death, and that when a young child gives stories of what he calls his previous life, such information is telepathically coming from another person who had such a life.  Such person may exist as a disembodied spirit in some realm of the dead.  There could be some reason why very young children could be more likely to be targets of such telepathic communication.  One possible reason might be that very young children have not been trained by society to dismiss the paranormal as impossible. 

A similar explanation could explain accounts given in past life regressions.  For quite a few years the trance medium Leonora Piper would seem to speak in the voice of dead persons, stating information that such persons could have known, but she could not have known.  Such cases may suggest that during a hypnotic trance there can be some extrasensory communication between the dead and the living.  If that is true, then such communication could be the source of many or most of the accounts given in past-life regressions.  

So if you are put in a hypnotic trance, and say that you recall living as Wilbur Dalton in the nineteenth century, it may not be that you actually were Wilbur Dalton in the nineteenth century. It may be that you are picking up through ESP some recollections sent to you by Wilbur Dalton, who may be currently living in some heavenly realm of the dead. 

There's another possible paranormal explanation for past life recollections. It could be that the memories of each person's life are stored in some information system that persists indefinitely. Such an information system has sometimes been called the Akashic records. Without believing all the claims that have been made about such Akashic records, we can postulate some paranormal information repository that accumulates information on each person's life, information on a person's experiences.  It could be that during hypnotic regression, people are able to fleetingly access such a repository.  So you may remember being Wilbur Dalton in the nineteenth century, not because you were Wilbur Dalton in the nineteenth century, but because you were somehow able to tap in to some mysterious repository that includes details of his experiences. 

Such an idea may not seem so improbable when we consider extraordinary cases involving what is called psychometry.  There have been many documented cases where some psychic seemed to be able to tell all kinds of information related to some object when being shown the object. So, for example, a psychic such as Mrs. Morel when given some piece of jewelry to see for the first time would be be able to tell accurate details about the object's owner and the owner's experiences, people she had never met.  You can try to explain evidence for psychometery by postulating that sometimes memories get stored in objects. But a better explanation may be that the object simply serves as a kind of prompt allowing the psychic to retrieve information from some paranormal repository of information perhaps storing information related to the lives and experiences of all those who have lived. If such a repository exists, it could be the source of some of the information accessed in past life regressions and past life recollections. 

It was abundantly documented during the nineteenth century that some hypnotized subjects would display astonishing powers of clairvoyance (see here and  here and here and here and here  for examples). They would describe in the most accurate detail places known only to some other person in the room.  Such a thing was called "traveling clairvoyance," and was rather similar to the "remote viewing" of the twentieth century, although it seemed to work far more powerfully. If such a "traveling clairvoyance" can be unlocked in a hypnotized subject to allow him to see far away in space, it could be that such a subject (with unleashed psychic powers) could also mentally travel in time, to peer into the experiences of some person who lived before (but not a person who the seer ever was in a previous life).  

The evidence for paranormal occurrences under hypnosis is extremely vast. A typical psychology textbook discussing hypnosis will discuss only a small subset of the phenomena that have been observed under hypnosis, typically only the least interesting phenomena.  A deep study of hypnotic phenomena will lead you to think that hypnosis can be the doorway to unfathomable powers of the human mind.  If that is true, then there are many strange possibilities that might explain reports of past-lives during hypnosis, some of them being possibilities that do involve reincarnation. 

Bruce Greyson (an MD who is one of the leading researchers of near-death experiences) tells us of an interesting case in which three family members all claimed to be the reincarnation of the same person.  You can read about the case on page 6 of the link here.  We read the following:

"She [Rhonda Mead] also identified pieces of jewelry and other objects of Susan Albert’s as hers, and mentioned by name her great-grandmother’s dog, who had died before she was born. Furthermore, she had an oddly shaped scar on her right arm that resembled a tattoo her great-grandmother had on that arm, and she expressed likes and dislikes that were the same as Susan Albert’s. Around the same time of Rhonda’s birth, two other baby girls, Sheila and Susan Richards, were born to the extended family, both of whom also claimed to have been Susan Albert in their past life. Antonia Mills has investigated other cases of multiple children who claim to remember the same person among several of the Pacific Northwest tribes, and Ian Stevenson has noted such cases among the Inuit in Alaska and among the Igbo in Nigeria.  In other cases, a child will remember the past lives of two people who lived at the same time. And in some cases, the person whose life the child remembers died after the child was born. Such cases raise questions about how to interpret the children’s knowledge of someone else’s life."

Such cases may support the idea that "past-life recollections" may come from a person who did not actually live the life recalled. Because of a wealth of possibilities, it is hard to know exactly what is going on during past life regressions and past life recollections.  Such things may or may not be evidence for reincarnation.  In some cases they may be evidence for survival after death, but not clearly evidence for reincarnation. 

There is one type of protocol I would like to see done when using hypnosis relevant to reincarnation. We might call this a replication-seeking protocol. It would go like this:

(1) Put a person under hypnotic regression, and ask him to tell about his past lives.
(2) Record in a video all of the statements made.
(3) Bring the person out of the trance, and do not tell him about what he said, and do not show him the video. People normally do not recall (at least while they are not under hypnosis) what they said under hypnosis. 
(4) Months later put the same person under hypnotic regression, and ask him him to tell about his past lives, without mentioning anything the person said six months earlier.
(5) Record in a video all of the statements made.
(6) Compare the statements made in the first video with the statements made in the second video, to see whether they are consistent with each other, or whether they conflict with each other. 

 If there was no match, it would be evidence that an actual past life was not being recalled. For example, if John X. said in his first hypnotic session that in his previous life he was a fat baker in St. Louis, and said in his second hypnotic session that in his previous life he was a thin farmer in China, that would be evidence that he was not actually recalling a past life he had.  (By "his previous life" I mean here whatever earthly life he lived, if any, directly before this life, and do not mean "any previous life." For example, if John X. was born in 1960, and he says in Hypnotic Session 1 that in 1959 he was a fat baker in St. Louis, but says in Hypnotic Session 2 that in 1959 he was a thin farmer in China, those two stories conflict with each other, and would suggest that neither story is true. ) 

I am aware of only one case with a good information repetition across multiple hypnotic "past-life regressions." I read a claim that in the famous Bridey Murphy case, the person under hypnosis repeated "much of the information unchanged."  Looking up the book "The Search for Bridey Murphy" on www.archive.org, I do see some repetition of name, town and occupation information in each of three hypnotic sessions. The book provides transcripts of the hypnotic sessions. For example:

  • In the first hypnotic session on November 29, 1952 the subject first identifies herself as Friday Murphy (page 112), says she lives in the town of Cork, and says her father is named Duncan Murphy and her mother is named Kathleen. She identifies her father as a barrister (page 113). Later (page 114) she states her name as Bridey Murphy.
  • In the second hypnotic session on December 18,1952 (page 136) the subject identifies herself as Bridey Murphy living in Cork,  She says her mother's name is Kathleen and her father's name is Duncan (page 135), and she identifies her father as a barrister (page 137). 
  • In the third hypnotic session on January 22, 1953 (page 154) the subject identifies herself as Bridey, her mother as Kathleen, and her father as Duncan, with a job as a barrister in the town of Cork. 
This good repetition places the Bridey Murphy case above reported past life regressions in which we have no data on repetition of claims between different sessions. However, the repetition does not prove that the hypnotized subject really was Bridey Murphy in a previous life.  It could be the subject imagined Bridey Murphy in the first session (or telepathically communicated with the spirit of a deceased Bridey Murphy in the first session), and then simply remembered in the second and third sessions what she had said in that first session. 

A book by William Gregory MD stated this (using the word "sleeper" for a hypnotized person, and "sleep" for a hypnotic trance):

"As a general rule, but not a rule without some exceptions, the sleeper does not remember, after waking, what he may have seen, felt, tasted, smelled, heard, spoken, or done, during his sleep ; but when next put to sleep, he recollects perfectly all that has occurred, not only in the last sleep, but in all former sleeps, and, as in the ordinary state, with greater or less accuracy, although usually very accurately indeed."

So the repetition of a past-life claim in multiple hypnotic sessions does not show a past life really occurred. But a complete lack of repetition between the narrative details of multiple "past life regressions" might be used to discredit the claim that a past life is really being recalled. 

Accounts of near-death experiences tend to conflict with claims that people undergo multiple lifetimes on Earth. One of the most common features of near-death experiences is a report of encountering one or more deceased relatives in some afterlife realm.  Such reports may conflict with claims that souls are reincarnated soon after death. But there is always the possibility that earthly reincarnation is an option granted to a soul that survives death, an option that most surviving souls do not use, or only use rarely. 

Accounts by mediums also tend to conflict with claims that people undergo multiple lifetimes on Earth. Such seers typically report a deceased person as being available for communication, not unavailable because the person had reincarnated as someone else.  In a nineteenth century work a medium or clairvoyant is asked about the nature of the afterlife. When asked "Do we, after a certain time, inhabit again the earth ?" the simple answer of "No" was given. 

Some of the points I have made here are reasons for doubting much of the testimony in the book Abduction: Human Encounters With Aliens by Harvard psychologist John E. Mack.  Very much of the testimony of that book is testimony extracted under hypnotic regression.  But much of that testimony could be spontaneous imagination produced after suggestive questions by the hypnotist (Mack). It's very hard to tell, because Mack does not provide any transcripts of the hypnotic regression sessions. So we don't know how much the people were responding to leading questions. Mack also seems to give no sign that he checked for a repetition of recalled details by the same person under two different hypnotic sessions. We have no way of checking for repetition because of a lack of hypnotic session transcripts. So we should be skeptical when we read a statement like this on page 610:

"With conscious recall Arthur had not been able to make out details of an actual vehicle, but now [under hypnosis] he remembered something like ribs, a hatch, and seams, and the vehicle seemed to be made of a 'really shiny, light metal, like metal when it's superheated.' " 

Mack emphasizes that his reputed abductees have considerable similarities in their stories of abduction by extraterrestrials. But there is a way of explaining a large degree of similarity in such stories under hypnosis by the same person, without assuming abductions by extraterrestrials. It is abundantly claimed in the literature of hypnosis that powers such as telepathy and clairvoyance may be greatly increased when someone is hypnotized.  Now let us suppose a hypnotist such as Mack might have had a kind of model in his mind of what to expect when someone describes an extraterrestrial abduction.  Then, though a combination of suggestion and telepathy, it might be that hypnotized people might tend to give similar answers when asked by Mack questions such as "Tell us what happened during your extraterrestrial abduction." They might tend to pick up telepathically ideas about extraterrestrial abduction in the mind of their own hypnotist. 

Postscript: In his interesting book "Life Before Life," Richard M. Eyre discusses the concept of a spiritual pre-existence of souls, not here on Earth, but in some transcendent or heavenly realm, or some other dimension. On page 32, Eyre makes the interesting point that so-called past lives recollections may be the result of information acquired during a soul's pre-existence.  

Here is a hypothetical example:

(1) Long before having an earthly life,  John X. exists for 500 years in some heaven. 
(2) In such a heaven John X. talks to Peter Y. who died in 1950, and went to the same heaven. 
(3)  The earthly life of John X. then begins in 1960. 
(4) Around 1970 John X. is aware of things that happened to Peter Y., who he never met on Earth. 

John X. knowing such details about the life of Peter Y. might be taken for evidence that John X. was once Peter Y. But under the scenario above, we have a very different explanation of how John X. learned such details about the life of Peter Y.