Header 1

Our future, our universe, and other weighty topics


Friday, November 7, 2025

Scientist Flubs and Flops #14


 

sidetracked scientist

bad science teachers

vow of a materialist

slow scientific progress


science news story

academia groupthink

materialist thought police



quantum gravity

torture the data until it confesses




bad neuroscience procedure

multiverse madness



misleading brain visuals



                          Press button to watch video

what a human really is

  • "No sense has been given to the idea of encoding or representing factual information in the neurons and synapses of the brain." -- M. R. Bennett, Professor of Physiology at the University of Sydney (link).
  • ""Despite over a hundred years of research, the cellular/molecular mechanisms underlying learning and memory are still not completely understood. Many hypotheses have been proposed, but there is no consensus for any of these."  -- Two scientists in a 2024 paper (link). 
  • "We have still not discovered the physical basis of memory, despite more than a century of efforts by many leading figures. Researchers searching for the physical basis of memory are looking for the wrong thing (the associative bond) in the wrong place (the synaptic junction), guided by an erroneous conception of what memory is and the role it plays in computation." --Neuroscientist C.R. Gallistel, "The Physical Basis of Memory," 2021.
  • "To name but a few examples, the formation of memories and the basis of conscious  perception, crossing  the threshold  of  awareness, the  interplay  of  electrical  and  molecular-biochemical mechanisms of signal transduction at synapses, the role of glial cells in signal transduction and metabolism, the role of different brain states in the life-long reorganization of the synaptic structure or  the mechanism of how  cell  assemblies  generate a  concrete  cognitive  function are  all important processes that remain to be characterized." -- "The coming decade of digital brain research, a 2023 paper co-authored by more than 100 neuroscientists, one confessing scientists don't understand how a brain could store memories. 
  • "In contrast, the major mental illnesses...bipolar disorder, anxiety disorders, anorexia nervosa and depression have proved remarkably resistant to similar developments. Unfortunately, it is still not possible to cite a single neuroscience or genetic finding that has been of use to the practicing psychiatrist in managing these illnesses despite attempts to suggest the contrary." -- David Kingdon, Emeritus Professor of Mental Health Care Delivery. "Why Hasn't Neuroscience Delivered for Psychiatry?"
  • "Despite three decades of intense neuroimaging research, we still lack a neurobiological account for any psychiatric condition. Likewise, functional neuroimaging plays no role in clinical decision making....It remains difficult to refute a critique that psychiatry’s most fundamental characteristic is its ignorance. . . . Casting a cold eye on the psychiatric neuroimaging literature invites a conclusion that despite 30 years of intense research and considerable technological advances, this enterprise has not delivered a neurobiological account (i.e., a mechanistic explanation) for any psychiatric disorder, nor has it provided a credible imaging-based biomarker of clinical utility."  -- Neuroscientist Raymond Dolan and two other scientists (link). 
  • "Despite substantial efforts by many researchers, we still have no scientific theory of how brain activity can create, or be, conscious experience.” -- Donald D. Hoffman Department of Cognitive Sciences University of California, "Conscious Realism and the Mind-Body Problem."
  • "Little progress in solving the mystery of human cognition has been made to date." -- 2 neuroscientists, 2021 (link). 
  • " We don't know how a brain produces a thought." -- Neuroscientist Saskia De Vries (link). 
  • "You realize that neither the term ‘decision-making’ nor the term ‘attention’ actually corresponds to a thing in the brain." -- neuroscientist Paul Ciskek (link). 
  • "We know very little about the brain. We know about connections, but we don't know how information is processed." -- Neurobiologist Lu Chen
  • "The neuroscientific study of creativity is stuck and lost." -- Psychologist Arne Dietrich,  "Where in the brain is creativity: a brief account of a wild-goose chase."
  • "How creative ideas arise in our mind and in our brain is a key unresolved question." -- nine scientists (link).
For a 62-page free E-book filled with confessions like the ones above, use the link here 

No comments:

Post a Comment