Genetic
engineering was in the news this week. One news item was a National
Academy of Sciences study claiming that GMO's (genetically modified
food products) are safe. Given how financially entangled
scientists are with GMO's, a study written by a committee of
scientists may not mean very much. The 2015 scientific paper here is entitled "No Scientific Consensus on GMO Safety." I may
note that declaring GMO's are safe (based on past results) may be
like declaring that walking through a landmine field is safe, when
you are halfway through the landmine field, on the basis that you
haven't been blown up yet. Since GMO's are a continuous stream of
new products, we can never be sure when the next gene-gamble product
may blow up in our faces with devastating results.
Also in the news this week was a secret meeting recently of 150 scientists and
entrepreneurs recently at Harvard Medical School. The meeting was to
discuss the outrageous idea of making an artificial human genome.
This is something exponentially more risky than just creating
genetically modified foods. I guess the secrecy of the meeting is a
clue as to how things will work in the future, in regard to human
genetic engineering. It will probably be very secretive type of work.
It's
not hard to figure out why scientists would want to be secretive when
engaging in human genetic engineering. The reason is there's a very
large chance that attempts at playing God with the human genome will
result in hideous failures. Such failures may be given some
euphemistic name such as “suboptimal engineering results,” but
since the results may be grotesquely deformed humans, a simpler
description will simply be “monsters.”
Such
failures are almost guaranteed because of all the uncertainties.
Contrary to the impression you may have been given, the human genome
is not some clearly intelligible blueprint for a human body. The
human genome is a collection of chemicals and on/off switches. How
these chemicals and on/off switches add up to a human body plan is
anything but clear. In fact, there are quite a few reasons for
believing that the human genome does not even store the body plan of
humans (as discussed here). Even if the genome does store the human body, then
that body plan is stored in an exceptionally obscure, roundabout,
recondite way. The human genome is like some tower-sized tangled ball
of wire, harder to unravel then 50 million lines of what programmers
call “spaghetti code.”
The
human genome has been compared to machine language, the series of 0's
and 1's that are read directly by a computer, but are
all-but-unintelligible to humans. In trying to change the human
genome, our genetic engineers are like hackers trying to modify a
billion bytes of machine language, a body of code which is almost
entirely unintelligible. So
it is inevitable that many mistakes will be made in the first
attempts at human genetic engineering.
We
can imagine all kinds of shocking results: humans with a single eye
above their noses, humans with mouths that are always wide open,
humans with fin-like hands, humans with legs fused together, humans
with heads that always droop down, humans without skin, humans with
skin that sags down 4 inches, or humans with eyes that can only be
opened with the fingers.
We
can imagine how damaging it would be to a human genetic engineering
effort if a single photo were to be released of a monstrous human
body that was the result of faulty genetic engineering. So I imagine
that those engaging in genetic engineering of humans will want to
keep things secret. A single memorable photo can have a huge effect
on public opinion, as was shown by that photo during the Vietnam War
of the crying girl fleeing a napalm attack.
But
how will the human genetic engineers enforce secrecy? They might do
that by making use of the national security apparatus which enforces
such draconian penalties for revealing state secrets. It might work
like this: the human genetic engineers will appeal to the US
government, asking that their efforts be declared a state secret, a
secret important to US national security. You can imagine all kind
of rationales that might be used. They might claim that the ultimate
goal of genetically engineering humans was to create better soldiers,
and that therefore genetic engineering of humans should be as secret
as developing new types of fighter-jets or tanks.
Once
their efforts were classified, the human genetic engineers would have
a way to cover up the unfortunate accidents that would be not-uncommon
products of their efforts. Perhaps ugly mutants resulting from
genetic engineering will be killed off to get rid of evidence of
their existence. Or perhaps they will be confined to special
confinement cells, hidden from public view. Anyone who photographed
such monsters might receive a 20-year prison sentence, on the grounds
that he had released classified government information that must be kept
secret on national security grounds.
Does
it sound too far-fetched to imagine a future government throwing
someone in jail for a long time merely for revealing ugly government
secrets? I don't think this is too hard to believe, given that
Chelsea Manning (formerly Bradley Manning) is now serving a long
prison sentence, mainly for releasing to WikiLeaks an embarrassing
video showing a US army helicopter carelessly gunning down
civilians.
The
hideous truth of genetic engineering failures will be hidden from the
public. In the future the public will see pleasant advertisements like the one
below, which advertise cases of successful genetic engineering.
But
the public will never learn about the places where the hideous
failures of genetic engineering will be kept – places like that shown
below:
No comments:
Post a Comment