My previous post was a
science fiction story called The Ocean Deniers of Centralia
that told the tale of an extraterrestrial planet that was inhabited
only by a small kingdom (Centralia) at the center of a great continent that made
up most of the planet. The scientists in the kingdom made assumptions
about nature based on their limited experience, dogmatically
concluding that the whole planet was as dry as their kingdom, and
that water never existed in large bodies. But over a period of more
than a century, explorers would occasionally report some utterly
anomalous experiences – experiences involving encounters with
distant oceans and seas (bodies of water which, according to the
dogmatic assumptions of Centralian scientists, should not exist).
These anomalous reports were totally rejected by the scientists of
Centralia, who dismissed the people reporting the experiences as
frauds, liars, fools or people suffering from hallucinations.
The story is an allegory.
The scientists of Centralia represent typical scientists of modern
academia. The explorers reporting the anomalous experiences represent
those who have reported various types of paranormal experiences. For
well over 150 years, humans have reported very anomalous experiences.
Such reports have included apparition sightings, experiences with
ESP, near-death experiences, experiences with seances and mediums,
sightings of UFOs, photographs of orbs, premonitions of disaster
that some came true, precognitive dreams, and a wide variety of
other phenomena that include various types of remarkable spiritual
experiences. The person who has one of these experiences often feels
as if he is coming into contact with some great previously
undiscovered reality, and may often feel like some explorer who has
encountered some great ocean or sea that is unknown to the vast
majority of his countrymen.
But despite the fact that
such experiences have been reported for such a long time by such a
large number of people, these experiences have been entirely rejected
by most mainstream scientists. They have dismissed the people
having such experiences as frauds, fools, liars, or people having
hallucinations. The modern-day scientists who dismisses
all this evidence (delivered by so many witnesses over such a long
period) is quite similar to the scientists of Centralia in my story,
who refused to accept reports of distant seas and a distant ocean
despite abundant testimony. Just as the scientists of Centralia
became overconfident in my story -- assuming all of the reality on
their planet was like the dry, dusty reality they understood – many
scientists on our planet have become overconfident and dogmatic,
proclaiming that reality consists only of a material reality like
that they are familiar with, and precluding (without any sound basis
for such an exclusion) the possibility of a vast unknown spiritual
reality as important as our known material reality.
The professor responds to a report of the paranormal
In my story the scientists
of Centralia do more than just refuse to believe eyewitness testimony
– they also refuse to believe photographic evidence. Does this part
of the story break the allegory? Not at all. Our modern scientists
refuse to accept some evidence for the paranormal that is either
photographic or as good as photographic, in the sense of being
something much more than just anecdotal. Our scientists typically
refuse to accept innumerable photographs and videos of anomalous
lights or UFOs in the sky; they ignore photos that often appear to
show what looks either like apparitions or ghostly mists; they pay no
attention to huge crop circles that suddenly appear, with some very
hard-to-explain characteristics; and our scientists generally pay no
attention to countless very dramatic photos of anomalous orbs in the
sky and indoors, which often show orbs with bright colors, or orbs
making extremely dramatic motions, or orbs appearing in great
dramatic colorful swarms.
Our modern scientists also typically dismiss and belittle laboratory experiments for ESP which have repeatedly been very successful, which have met all the standards of good experimental science, and which produced results so dramatic that they cannot be explained as being due to coincidence (results that confirm a great abundance of anecdotal reports of ESP, such as those gathered so systematically by Louisa Rhine). In trying to explain away such evidence, our scientists sometimes invent ridiculous “swamp gas” types of explanations similar to the goofy explanation made in my story by one of the Centralian scientists (the one who tried to explain a photo of an ocean as being a photo of clouds).
Our modern scientists also typically dismiss and belittle laboratory experiments for ESP which have repeatedly been very successful, which have met all the standards of good experimental science, and which produced results so dramatic that they cannot be explained as being due to coincidence (results that confirm a great abundance of anecdotal reports of ESP, such as those gathered so systematically by Louisa Rhine). In trying to explain away such evidence, our scientists sometimes invent ridiculous “swamp gas” types of explanations similar to the goofy explanation made in my story by one of the Centralian scientists (the one who tried to explain a photo of an ocean as being a photo of clouds).
How can we understand this
strange refusal of so many scientists to give the paranormal the
objective consideration it deserves? We can only understand this by
considering sociological factors. Scientific academia is very much a
clannish subculture, and particular subcultures have their group norms and
group taboos (for example, wearing a Yankees baseball cap is taboo
among Red Sox fans, and wearing pink flowery shirts is taboo in biker
gangs). The paranormal has become a group taboo in scientific
academia, just like making certain types of statements about gays or
abortion are group taboos within particular political groups. Any
member of a subculture who flaunts that subculture's group norms and
group taboos is subject to severe sanctions by other members of that
group, which work to enforce group conformity. Call it the iron
hand of peer pressure.
There is a fascinating new article on BBC.com about anomalous abilities of blind people to
apparently detect objects they cannot see. The article includes a video of a blind man walking down a hall filled with obstacles, and
not bumping into anything (the man claims to have seen nothing). This
article is calling this ability “blindsight,” and as long as that
term is used the ability may attract some interest among scientists.
But sooner or later someone will probably start saying, “This is
actually clairvoyance, it's paranormal.” Then probably
scientists will stop paying much attention to it, using their
perennial excuse that “things like that can't happen.”
Yes, it is just as if we
are living in the benighted kingdom of Centralia depicted in my
story, where the “official party line” of a small overconfident
elite somehow drowns out a large body of compelling evidence
conflicting with that dogma. I'm not a cartoonist, but I can imagine
an editorial-style cartoon that might illustrate how mainstream
scientists typically handle reports of the paranormal. The cartoon
would show two scientists next to a rug. One scientist would be
holding a page prominently marked, “Latest evidence of the
paranormal.” That scientist would be smiling, and would say to his
fellow scientist, “Don't worry, we'll just sweep this under the rug
once again.” To the left of the scientists, we would see that there
was a bump in the middle of the rug.
And that bump in the rug
would be as tall as an NBA basketball player.
No comments:
Post a Comment