In
part1, part 2, and part 3 of this 4-part series of blog posts, I
listed 36 things that science can't explain. In this post I'll finish
up the 4-part series by listing 14 more things that science cannot
explain.
37. Savants
Savants are individuals
who have some mental disability but also have some extraordinary
mental talents. Many people are familiar with savants from the film
Rain Man starring
Dustin Hoffman, based on an actual savant.
An example of a savant is Daniel Tammer, who has been diagnosed with Asperger Syndrome. He holds
the European record for reciting Pi from memory, to 22,514 digits.
Supposedly he learned the Icelandic language in only ten days.
Another example of a savant is the late Kim Peek, who supposedly could accurately recall the details of 12,000 books he had read, despite having an IQ of only 87. Like several savants, he had the ability to instantly calculate the day of the week on which any person he met was born. Still another savant is Derek Paravicini, who can play a piece of music accurately after hearing it just once. He was born very prematurely, at only 25 weeks.
Another example of a savant is the late Kim Peek, who supposedly could accurately recall the details of 12,000 books he had read, despite having an IQ of only 87. Like several savants, he had the ability to instantly calculate the day of the week on which any person he met was born. Still another savant is Derek Paravicini, who can play a piece of music accurately after hearing it just once. He was born very prematurely, at only 25 weeks.
While science can explain
while people deprived of some sense (such as sight) may have
increased abilities relating to some other sense, science suggests
no explanation for why a severe deficit in one mental area might lead
to a radically improved ability in some other area, an ability we
would not expect any human to have.
38. The placebo effect
A placebo is typically a
sugar pill that a doctor gives to a patient, merely in the hopes that
the patient's belief that he is getting an effective treatment will
actually do some good. The placebo effect is the astonishing degree
to which placebos are actually effective in reducing symptoms. One
study indicates that half of a drug's effectiveness may be due to the
placebo effect. Another
study indicates that when patients are given a placebo pill labeled
as a drug, it does just as well in alleviating migraine headaches as
when patients are given an actual drug labeled as a placebo.
Why should people so often get better or have their pain eased simply because they believe they are taking some medicine that is
effective? The placebo effect suggests a “mind over body” effect
which modern science is quite unable to account for.
39. The “law of the
five allowed stable particles”
Most of the laws of nature
have been given names by scientists. But there is one very important
law that hasn't been give a name, so I sometimes give it a name by
calling it “the law of the five allowed stable particles.” This
is simply the law that when high-energy particles are colliding,
resulting in a shower of “daughter particles,” nature always
makes sure that the resulting stable particles are one of only five
types: protons (with a rest mass of 1.672 X 10-27
kilogram), neutrons (with a rest mass of 1.674 X 10-27
kilogram), electrons (with a rest mass of 9.109 X 10-31
kilogram), photons (with no rest mass), or neutrinos (with almost no
rest mass).
Stable particles between these masses are never created from these high-energy collisions of particles. For example, in subatomic particle colliders such as the Large Hadron Collider, we only see the creation of stable particles that are the electron mass or about 1836 times the electron mass, and never see the creation of stable particles that are between 100 and 1000 times the electron mass. Why does nature follow this rule? We know the rule is beneficial to life, as it allows for the kind of “standardization” that facilitates life's existence. But science has no idea why nature should follow this law in such an invariable way, as if it had been programmed into nature by some cosmic programmer.
Stable particles between these masses are never created from these high-energy collisions of particles. For example, in subatomic particle colliders such as the Large Hadron Collider, we only see the creation of stable particles that are the electron mass or about 1836 times the electron mass, and never see the creation of stable particles that are between 100 and 1000 times the electron mass. Why does nature follow this rule? We know the rule is beneficial to life, as it allows for the kind of “standardization” that facilitates life's existence. But science has no idea why nature should follow this law in such an invariable way, as if it had been programmed into nature by some cosmic programmer.
40. Verified
premonitions
Verified
premonitions can be defined as cases in which someone has a feeling
or dream about something that is going to happen in the future, only
to later find just such a thing did happen. Many fascinating cases
have occurred in human history.
On
May 3, 1812, John Williams had the same dream three times in a single
night: a very specific dream about someone assassinating Spencer
Perceval, the British Prime Minister. Eight days later Perceval was
assassinated, and several of the details matched William's dream.
Two
weeks before he was assassinated, Abraham Lincoln had a dream that he
would be assassinated. The famous writer Mark Twain had a dream
about the death of his brother that turned out to closely match what
happened a few days later. Several people had premonitions that
something would go wrong on the Titanic before it sunk. One person
who had a ticket on the ill-fated ship had two dreams that the ship
would overturn, with passengers in the water.
In
1950 a church blew up in Beatrice, Nebraska, at a time when the
church normally would have had a choir practice. Amazingly, no one
was hurt, because the church was empty. We can only guess at how many
of these people felt a premonition of doom, and avoided their regular
choir practice.
According
to research published in the Journal of the Society for Psychical
Research, dozens of people had premonitions of disaster before the
Aberfan avalanche that killed 144 people. Some had dreams about such
a disaster before it happened. During World War II Winston Churchill
had two premonitions that may have saved his life or those of others.
One premonition led him to switch sides on his staff car. A bomb then
went off on the side he moved away from. Another premonition led him
to tell his kitchen staff to leave the kitchen and go underground. A
bomb then destroyed the kitchen.
A
number of people also had premonitions of the September 11, 2001
attacks on the World Trade Center. In early September, Lawrence
Francis Boisseau had a dream that the World Trade Center was
collapsing around him. Boisseau was killed in the attack.
Science offers no
explanation for such cases, other than the unconvincing explanation
of mere coincidence.
41. Spiral galaxy spin
non-randomness
Physicist Michael
Longo and his helpers studied more than 15,000 galaxies to determine
which direction they were spinning (something that seems like the
most tedious assignment imaginable). The end result was very
surprising. Instead of finding that spiral galaxies always spin in
one direction 50% of the time and the other direction 50% of the
time, Longo found that in some parts of the sky galaxies prefer to
spin one way or the other significantly more frequently.
According to his research,
in some directions of the sky there is an almost exact balance
between galaxies that are spinning in a “left-handed” way and
galaxies spinning in the opposite, “right-handed” way. But in
other directions of the sky, “left-handedness” can be preferred
by as much as 7% over “right-handedness.” For more information,
read this blog post.
42. Crop circles
When
Doug Bower and Dave Chorley
in
1991 claimed to have made some 200 crop circles since the 1970's,
their story was taken as fact by skeptics, despite the lack of any
explanation as to why the two would have done this incredibly
laborious task for more than a decade without profiting from it.
This incident kind of illustrates that when a skeptic is presented
with testimony that he doesn't want to believe, he will invent
endless excuses for not accepting the testimony. But when testimony
is presented that a skeptic wants to believe, he may accept it
without proof, no matter how farfetched it may be. There is, in
reality, little basis for accepting Bower and Chorley's farfetched tale,
and since it was made in 1991 by men in their sixties, it cannot be
used as an explanation for crop circles that have continued to appear
around the world since then, often with incredibly intricate patterns
that seem impossible for any small team of humans to have created overnight.
43. Kepler 78b
Kepler 78b is a
planet so strange that it will be one of the topics discussed next
month on an episode of NASA's Unexplained Files. For a discussion of
why science is currently unable to explain this planet, see this blog
post.
44. Fast moving orbs
You can do a Google
image search for “moving orbs” to see an astonishing set of
photos from many different web sites, sites showing unidentified
circular objects or spherical objects moving at very fast speeds. Since such photos show strong
motion blur and the photographic effect known as ghosting, they are
indications of objects moving very rapidly, much faster than 100
miles an hours. Skeptics and scientists have no plausible explanation for these
anomalies. One utterly lame explanation is to suggest that such
photos are produced when someone photographs moving insects. That
doesn't work, because the average speed of an insect such as a house
fly is only about 3 miles an hour, and the photos of fast moving orbs show
objects that seem to be moving more than 30 times faster than that.
Moreover, photos of fast moving orbs (in particular, this series of 18 photos) often show the objects making
sharp right-angle turns, sharp u-turns, and sharp undulations, which are
types of motion that we never observe from dust, birds, or insects.
45. “Peak in
Darien” experiences
See this post for a
discussion of these experiences, in which people seemed to know about
the deaths of people that should have been unknown to them.
46. Mars
anomalies
See this set of four blog posts for a discussion of recent anomalies on Mars that
scientists and skeptics are unable to account for.
47. Fermi's
Paradox
Science currently
has no good explanation for this long-standing mystery of why
extraterrestrial life hasn't been discovered yet.
48. Fermi
Bubbles
While mentioning
Fermi, I should also mention Fermi bubbles. These are two gigantic
bubbles of energy above and below the plane of our galaxy. Scientists
have no good explanation for them.
Fermi bubbles (credit: NASA)
49. LEDA
074886
LEDA 074886 is a
galaxy with a rectangular shape. Scientists have no good explanation
for how this could have come about.
50. The “duality”
of electrons
When certain
experiments are performed, electrons seem to behave exactly as if
they were particles. When certain other experiments are performed,
electrons seem to behave exactly as if they were waves. Scientists have not
been able to explain why this strange duality exists. It seems as strange
as some animal that looks like a giraffe when you photograph it with
an Olympus camera, but looks like a lion when you photograph it with
a Sony camera.
No comments:
Post a Comment