Before
too many decades we may see the appearance of a small number of
genetically-enhanced humans with higher intelligence or much longer lifespans. This may
create a social upheaval, and the tremors may penetrate deep into our
laws and moral ideas.
Today
if you ask anyone whether all human beings are of equal worth, almost
anyone would agree with such a statement. In many cases people act
in a very different way, as if the citizens of their country are
worth more than the citizens of other countries. But at least almost
all of us would answer affirmatively when asked if all human lives
are of equal value.
But
in the future, things may be very different. We may see the rise of a
small group of humans with extremely long lifespans. We may also see
the appearance of some humans with a much higher level of
intelligence. If that happens, will the “all humans are of equal
worth” idea continue to be endorsed by all? Something very
different may happen. We may see people start talking about
“super-lives” that are worth more than regular lives.
Here
is the kind of reasoning that may come into play:
Is
the life of a man who will live to be 1000 worth the same as a man
who will live to be 80? Is the life of a man with an intelligence
quotient of 500 worth the same as a man with an IQ of 100? Of course
not! We must distinguish between ordinary lives, and super-lives. It
is only logical to consider a super-life as worth more than a regular
life. How much more? That is a matter to be calculated, using logical
mathematics.
What
kind of “logical mathematics” might such a person have in mind?
It could work something like this. Someone might calculate that if a
superhuman has a lifespan x times greater than the regular
lifespan, then that superhuman has a super-life worth x times
more than a regular life. Someone might also calculate that if a
superhuman has an intelligence x times greater than the
average human intelligence, then that superhuman has a super-life
worth x times more than a regular life. Such calculations
might be applied simultaneously, so that someone with a lifespan five
times greater than the average lifespan (and an intelligence five
times greater than the average intelligence) might then be considered
to be worth 25 times more than a person of average intelligence and
average lifespan.
I
am not at all saying that I agree with such calculations, nor am I
saying that a superhuman should be considered some type of
“super-life” worth more than a regular life. I am merely
suggesting that this type of reasoning may become popular, regardless
of its validity. It may even be that the rules of law are rewritten
to take such calculations into effect. One can only imagine the
bizarre legal ramifications.
A
new law might be introduced saying that if a superhuman is very sick or badly
injured, and needs to get to the hospital quickly, he has the right
to drive to the hospital as fast as he can, even if that means
running over and killing ordinary humans in his path. Superhumans may
have a special 911-like number they can call to summon an ambulance,
a type of ambulance that arrives more quickly than ambulances for
ordinary humans.
The
government might cut foreign aid to help poor and starving people in
other countries, reallocating such funds to pay for the genetic
engineering needed to create superhumans. If anyone complained about
the loss of life, the official rebuttal might be: it is better to
create one super-life than to save ten regular lives.
A
new law might be introduced saying that if a superhuman has a
reasonable reason for suspecting that a
regular human might kill him, the superhuman has the right to draw a
gun and kill that human. Superhumans may walk out of court
uncharged, by merely using an excuse such as this: “He looked
rather mean and scary, so I killed him.”
Superhumans
might be granted cards that place them first in line for any organ
transplant, first in line for any blood transfusion, and first in
line whenever they walk into an emergency room. Instead
of the traditional lifeboat rule of “women and children first” when a ship
is sinking, the new rule might be “superhumans first; then women
and children.” Faced with two fires at the same time in a city,
computers might route fire trucks to first go to the blazing home of
a superhuman, and only later to go to the blazing house of a regular
human.
When
it comes to education, we can expect that the superhumans will get
the finest free schools along with free college educations at elite
universities. No one will be able to resist this slogan: a
super-mind is a super-terrible thing to waste.
If
such laws and provisions are introduced, they will no doubt create
bitter resentment. We ordinary humans are used to being the top race
on this planet. We will not take kindly to being relegated to
second-class status. One can imagine an angry mob of regular humans
carrying torches and pitchforks, along with hand-made signs saying:
Death to the superhumans!
If
something like that happens, then all the talk about superhumans
having a thousand-year lifespan may turn out to be ironically
inaccurate. Hunted down by resentful humans, the superhumans may not
even live as long as ordinary humans.
No comments:
Post a Comment